Creative
Piveth or Astra. They are different generation paths, not filters you apply after the fact. Piveth currently outputs 10-second video in 9:16 or 16:9. Astra can use 10 to 30 seconds and also 1:1, 2:3 and 3:2.
Fashion UGC generator
FashionUGC is a fashion-specific generator. You start with clothing photography, pick a creative, duration and frame, then generate a short UGC-style video around that garment. It is not a blank prompt-to-video canvas, and it is not customer footage.
A fashion UGC generator takes a product still and produces a short video that behaves more like creator-style social content than like a catalog plate sliding across the screen.
Those are three different things, and mixing them up is how brands end up disappointed.
Normal product photography is made to show the garment clearly. Lighting, crop and retouching serve the store page. Traditional creator UGC is filmed by a person wearing or handling the piece. FashionUGC sits between those. It uses the photograph as visual grounding and generates UGC-style motion around the same item.
That last distinction matters. The output is not a real customer video. Call it UGC-style when you brief a team or a client, then review it the way you would review any generated asset.
Generic image-to-video tools are happy to invent a dress that almost looks like yours. Fashion work cannot live with almost.
The garment is the subject. A check, a hem, a neckline, a logo placement: those details are why someone stops. A fashion-specific workflow keeps the source photograph in the job so the generation has something real to hold onto.
That is also why extra references help when a single plate hides something important. A back cut-out will not appear if you never showed the back. A print will drift if the only photo is soft or tightly cropped.
You do not write a cinematic prompt and hope the clothing survives. You upload the piece, choose how the video should feel, and generate from those inputs.
One sharp image can be enough when the garment is fully visible. Add more views of the same SKU when the design lives in the back, the side, or a small construction detail. FashionUGC accepts up to six images of the same garment.
If you want the garment-angle version of this story, the clothing video generator page stays with fit, silhouette and reference photos.
Product transformation
This published example starts from a mannequin photograph of a checkered midi dress and becomes a 12-second 9:16 FashionUGC video.
Mannequin product photo
Creative name is not stored on this published example. The facts above are taken from the files on this page. Open the full generation.
The generator is short on mystery and long on a few decisions. Those decisions are the same ones you see on the homepage create form.
Piveth or Astra. They are different generation paths, not filters you apply after the fact. Piveth currently outputs 10-second video in 9:16 or 16:9. Astra can use 10 to 30 seconds and also 1:1, 2:3 and 3:2.
The interface offers 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 seconds. Only the lengths the chosen creative accepts will stay available. A 25-second clip is not an option on Piveth.
Pick the shape for where the video will live. Vertical 9:16 is the usual short-form choice. Landscape, square, portrait and wide exist when the placement is not a phone feed.
Upload one to six photos of the same garment. JPEG, PNG or WebP, up to 8 MB each. Front, back, side, detail, on-body and flat lay are useful kinds of reference, not a required checklist.
Generated results vary. Treat the first output as a draft you review, not as something that ships itself.
Most teams already have somewhere the stills go: the product page, a lookbook, a wholesale PDF. The generated clips are for the places that expect movement.
They can sit in a social calendar next to creator posts. They can be cut into a Reel or TikTok draft. They can be a YouTube Short. They can be one more visual in a paid test. They can support a launch when the campaign photography is not ready for every SKU.
None of that is a promise about reach, saves or return on ad spend. FashionUGC makes the file. Your team decides whether the file is good enough to use.
If you want fashion video without the UGC-style framing, start with the AI fashion video generator. If the destination is a store content workflow, the ecommerce use case is the clearer page. For the still-to-motion steps themselves, stay with product photo to video.
A physical shoot still wins when you need original human footage, a specific location, or a director in the room. Photographers and creators are not a problem FashionUGC is trying to delete.
You need real movement from a person, a campaign idea that does not exist in the catalog photos, or control over performance, styling and location. That work has a different budget and a different finish.
The garment is already photographed, you need another product-led clip, and organizing a new setup for this SKU would take longer than the idea is worth. You still review the output.
A fashion UGC generator turns clothing product photos into short videos that look closer to creator-style social content than to a static catalog plate. FashionUGC does that for garments you already photographed. The result is UGC-style motion, not a real customer clip.
No. Traditional UGC is filmed by a person. FashionUGC starts from product photography and generates UGC-style video around that garment. Review the output before you publish it. It is another production path, not a substitute for a creator partnership.
You need at least one clear photo of the garment. You can add more images of the same piece, up to six. Then choose a creative (Piveth or Astra), a duration the creative supports, and a frame.
Clothing is the category available now. Beauty and Accessories are planned. They are not open for generation yet.
Try it with your product
Upload the garment, choose the creative and format, then generate a FashionUGC video.